Quantcast
Channel: Film
Viewing all 536 articles
Browse latest View live

Psychiatrists studied 400 movies to find the most realistic psychopath

$
0
0

the silence of the lambs

The unassuming Norman Bates might creep you out, and the flesh-hungry Hannibal Lecter might make your skin crawl.

But according to one group of psychiatrists, these men aren't Hollywood's most realistic psychopaths.

In fact, they may not be psychopaths at all.

Psychopathy, loosely defined, is a varying combination of cold-heartedness and violence. The most extreme psychopaths kill without remorse, mutilating victims with as much emotion as you or I might brush our teeth.

This is known as "classic" or "idiopathic" psychopathy, but sometimes the disorder is more covert, like with manipulative smooth talkers who aren't necessarily violent.

In 2014, the Belgian psychiatry professor Samuel Leistedt wanted to find out which movie characters embodied those traits best.

So, as any film buff would, Leistedt called on 10 of his friends to help him watch 400 movies over the course of three years. The films spanned nearly a century, from 1915 to 2010. When the team finished watching all the films, they'd ended up with 126 psychopathic characters, 105 of whom were male. 

Here's the breakdown they ended up with.

Most realistic psychopaths

1. Anton Chigurh, "No Country for Old Men"

No country for old men javier bardemJavier Bardem's character in "No Country for Old Men" is a classic psychopath, Leistedt and his colleagues conclude in their report. He approaches murder with an uncanny sense of normalcy, perfectly happy to empty his trademark bolt pistol without so much as a wince.

"He seems to be effectively invulnerable and resistant to any form of emotion or humanity," Leistedt writes.

2. Hans Beckert, "M"

hans beckertPeter Lorre's child-killing character in the 1931 German film "M" embodies many of the traits that would now be thought of belonging to a child predator, Leistedt and his colleagues observe. 

"Lorre portrays Beckert as an outwardly unremarkable man tormented by a compulsion to murder children ritualistically," they write. The character would most likely be diagnosed as a "pseudopsychopath," which many would more commonly refer to as a sociopath. His brutality also hints at psychosis.

3. Henry Lee Lucas, "Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer"

michael rookerLoosely based on the true story of Henry Lee Lucas, a Texas man who confessed to hundreds of murders throughout the country, the 1990 film chronicles the unstable life of a grisly serial killer. 

Leistedt argues the character's inability to plan ahead, coupled with his turbulent personal life and poor family relationships, make him a textbook idiopathic psychopath.

The unrealistic 

More iconic psychopaths, including Patrick Bateman ("American Psycho"), Gordon Gekko ("Wall Street"), Norman Bates ("Psycho"), and Hannibal Lecter ("Silence of the Lambs"), may be entertaining or frightening, but Leistedt and his team argue their character traits don't quite fit the psychopath mold.

Norman Bates, for example, seems more to be more delusional — or psychotic — than psychopathic. He is at the mercy of a fantasy, not complicit in a real-world crime.

"In our specific topic of interest, it appears that psychopathy in the cinema, despite a real clinical evolution remains fictional," the authors write. "Most of the psychopathic villains in popular fiction resemble international and universal boogeyman, almost as 'villain archetypes.'"

In other words, only a minority of psychopathic characters actually deserve a diagnosis. The rest simply fit our not-so-accurate stereotype.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The top illegally downloaded movies of 2015


George Clooney nails Hollywood's diversity problem

A controlled explosion for a new Jackie Chan movie caused panic in London

Watch Johnny Depp play Donald Trump in a new Funny or Die movie

This incredible action movie looks more like a video game than a film

Studios actually spend a staggering amount of money trying to get their films nominated at the Oscars

The director of the Oscar-nominated documentary about the Indonesian genocide, 'The Look of Silence,' on 2 of the film's gut-wrenching scenes

$
0
0

Following up on his acclaimed first documentary on the Indonesian genocide of 1965, filmmaker Joshua Oppenheimer has released a companion feature, "The Look of Silence," which is competing for Best Documentary at Sunday's Academy Awards ceremony.

Oppenheimer's first piece, "The Act of Killing," also Oscar-nominated, was screened before some members of Congress and helped Oppenheimer win a coveted MacArthur "genius" award.

In fall 1965, six army generals were killed in an attempted coup of the Indonesian government. As a result, some 500,000 to 1 million people were killed over five months in an anti-communist purge of the alleged perpetrators.

"The Look of Silence" follows its main character, Adi, an optometrist, as he helps and confronts the men who allegedly killed his brother some 50 years ago.

Here, the director talks about two pivotal scenes in the film.

Produced and edited by Josh WolffCinematography by David Fang.

Follow BI Video: On Twitter

Join the conversation about this story »

The best movies of 2015 have this one admirable thing in common

$
0
0

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences acknowledged there is a lack of racial diversity among the nominees in this year's Academy Awards. The organization pledged to address the issue by reassessing its membership as well as its voting procedures.

However there is one aspect of this year's awards that does indeed show progress, not only on the part of the Academy, but on that of the movie business as a whole.

Produced by Graham Flanagan

Follow BI Video: On Twitter 

 

Join the conversation about this story »


'The Look of Silence,' a film about the 1965 Indonesian genocide, looks to capture the Oscar for Best Documentary after picking up coveted 2016 Spirit Award

$
0
0

Following up on his acclaimed first documentary on the Indonesian genocide of 1965, filmmaker Joshua Oppenheimer has released a companion feature, "The Look of Silence," which is competing for Best Documentary at today's Academy Awards ceremony. With the film winning the Spirit Award for Best Documentary yesterday, this could be a bellwether ahead of the Oscars.

Oppenheimer's first piece, "The Act of Killing," also Oscar-nominated, was screened before some members of Congress and helped Oppenheimer win a prestigious MacArthur "genius" award.

In fall 1965, six army generals were killed in an attempted coup of the Indonesian government. As a result, some 500,000 to 1 million people were massacred over five months in an anti-communist purge of the alleged perpetrators.

"The Look of Silence" follows its main character, Adi, an optometrist, as he helps and confronts the men who allegedly killed his brother some 50 years ago.

Here, the director talks about two pivotal scenes in the film.

Produced and edited by Josh WolffCinematography by David Fang.

Follow BI Video: On Twitter

Join the conversation about this story »

'AMY’ — a shattering biographical portrait of Amy Winehouse — wins Oscar for Best Documentary

$
0
0

The 2015 film, "Amy," based on the life of singer-songwriter Amy Winehouse, became the highest-grossing British documentary film ever and has now won the Academy Award for Best Documentary. 

We recently sat down with the director Asif Kapadia, who discussed the transformations that take place in the film.

"Amy looks at the camera and looks at the audience all the way through the film, and what happens is, we, the person looking at her, change," he says. "We start off as Amy's friends, we become her manager, we become her boyfriend, we become the paparazzi eventually and her relationship with the camera changes during the film."

Kapadia continues, "I want people who really didn't like Amy to go and see 'Amy'. It's not just about appealing to the hardcore fan. It's about speaking to the people who really think they're not interested and getting them to fall in love with Amy Winehouse."

Producer/Editor: Josh Wolff

Cinematography: David Fang

Special Thanks: A24, Sam Rega

Join the conversation about this story »

Oscar-winning director of Amy Winehouse documentary reveals the 2 secrets behind the making of the heartbreaking film

$
0
0

The 2015 film, "Amy," based on the life of singer-songwriter Amy Winehouse, became the highest-grossing British documentary film ever and has now won the 2016 Academy Award for Best Documentary. 

We recently sat down with the director Asif Kapadia, who discussed the transformations that take place in the film, and to also learn how Kapadia gained the access to make the film.

Produced and edited by Josh WolffCinematography by David FangSpecial thanks A24 and Sam Rega.

Follow BI Video: On Twitter

Join the conversation about this story »

Grammy-winning singer explains why Zoe Saldana was a terrible choice to play Nina Simone

$
0
0

Nina Simone Zoe Saldana

Grammy-winning soul singer-songwriter India Arie was an early critic of the Nina Simone biopic Nina, penning an open letter on the decision to cast Zoe Saldana shortly after on-set photos of the actress in darkened skin and facial prosthetics surfaced in 2012.

Outrage over the long-shelved film went viral this week when the trailer was released on Wednesday, with the harshest response coming from the official Twitter account of Simone’s estate. (Simone’s only child, Lisa Simone Kelly, told Time that although the family disapproves of the film, she does not hold Saldana responsible for its failings.)

Arie, a musical descendant of Nina Simone who portrayed her in a musical performance during a 2003 episode of the 1960s-set NBC drama American Dreams, saw an early version of the movie during a 2013 private screening.

She spoke to The Hollywood Reporter about why she doesn’t blame Saldana, how this cinematic treatment of Simone fails to understand the icon's essence and legacy, and why she understands Judd Apatow's dismissal of the whole controversy: "To be of the most powerful race and gender in the world, of course that’s going to be your point of view."

This interview has been edited for length and clarity. 

What did you think of the movie?

It made me sad. The way she looked in the movie was ugly. Whether or not Nina Simone was beautiful in your eyes, I thought she was beautiful. But in this movie, she just looked weird. Her skin looked weird, and her nose looked weird. It made me wonder, was that how the filmmakers see her? Did they not think she was beautiful? Were they like, “Yeah, we got it! That’s how she looked.”

Nina SimoneWhy are some people calling this a blackface performance? Isn’t Zoe Saldana black? Or is this about her not “being black enough”?

It’s messy to put it that way. I think the best way to say it is that they casted her against type and went too far to make her fit. It’s not my place to say how Zoe Saldana perceives herself, and I can’t say how anybody else perceives her either. I see her as a black person of Hispanic origin, but I don’t even know what that really means, because I don’t know anything about race and Hispanic culture. 

In my open letter I called it “black(er) face.” I didn’t know what to call it either. I have heard that there were black actors who played blackface, back when people did that. I think blackface was putting charcoal on your face and doing a certain type of act on stage, the shucking and jiving. You could be black or white. [The Nina portrayal] is a caricature. You had to put a whole other face on someone’s face. 

Zoe has said that playing Nina Simone is her truth. Does she deserve any of this blame?

I don’t know her and I don’t think she did anything wrong. If I were in her shoes and I admired Nina Simone the way that I hear she does, I would have said yes, too, and I don’t even think I can act. If they asked me to sing Nina Simone, I got that. But I never pursued it because I felt it was not my place. And I don’t know if it was her place to do that.

I think they cast Zoe Saldana because they wanted a big name, but that makes me ask, “Is the name Nina Simone not big enough to get people to come to the movie?” 

india arieIt sounds like you’re not judging Zoe’s right to have accepted this role.

I can’t say I’m 100 percent not judging. There’s that vocal intellectual conversation in all the magazines and on TV, and there’s that emotional conversation about how we feel about things and how we are all on our own journeys. Then there’s that spiritual conversation, beneath race and all those things.

On that soul level, I’m not here to say what she’s supposed to do. Your soul is between you and God. On that soul level, it’s not my place to say. Emotionally, I respect her truth. Intellectually, though, I’m pretty judge-y about it. I don’t like it; I’m just being honest.

Actors do transform their looks to play real-life characters, most recently like Kate Winslet in Steve Jobs. Why does it matter that Zoe Saldana doesn’t look like the real Nina Simone?

I do kind of agree with that argument that we are diminishing the creativity of acting if you have to cast a person who looks exactly like her — in a perfect world, race shouldn’t matter, right? But we don’t live in a perfect world and it does matter.

Nina Simone sacrificed so much to be as bold as she was about being black and about being female in an era where that could have cost her life. She was denied access to a conservatory not because she didn’t play great, but because she was black. She would have had a different career if she looked like Lena Horne or Dorothy Dandridge. She could have been the first black female concert pianist, world-famous. When you look a certain way you get certain privileges; when you look another way you’re denied access to certain things, especially in her era.

So in the context of the politics of race in America and the politics of race in the entertainment industry in America, to make a movie about a person like that and cast an actress that has to wear blackface and a prosthetic nose is tone-deaf. To propagate that institutionalized racism that is historical in Hollywood in a movie about her is ironic in the worst possible way. 

Zoe-SaldanaIt’ll be nice when someone like a Zoe Saldana could play Nina Simone and there wouldn’t have to even be a conversation. That’s extreme, but what I mean is when there can just be black actresses with lots of opportunities because people can see the beauty in all kinds of different faces and skin tones. But we’re far away from that. We’re really far away from somebody like Zoe Saldana being able to play Nina Simone and nobody cares. Maybe that’s utopia.

Nina’s director, casting director, makeup and prosthetic artists and producers (except executive producers David Oyelowo and Aigerim Jakisheva) are all white. Do you think this problem could have been averted if more people principally involved in the production were black?

Yes, I think so. There are certain understandings that are just in your bones, based on who you are, and those would have been brought to bear. I don’t know if it would have been a perfect movie, but certain fundamental truths would have been taken into account. 

But there’s also a part of me that’s naïve and thinks, even if it were 98 percent white people involved in the making of this movie, it still could have been done right if they cared enough to do it right. But obviously, that didn’t happen.

Judd ApatowIn response to this controversy, Judd Apatow sarcastically tweeted, “I think all actors should only be allowed to play themselves. It is offensive to pretend to be other people.” In other words, he seems to be defending artistic freedom of expression.

I believe in freedom of expression, too. But when someone’s freedom of expression is denied to give someone else a freedom of expression, then who is free? What he’s saying doesn’t take into account so many things that matter to this story. I see why that is his point of view and he has that right. Why would you have the point of view of a black woman when you’re a white man? I respect his perspective.

It sounds like he has the utopian perspective you were talking about, where there’s not a problem if Zoe Saldana plays Nina Simone because there’s not a limit of opportunities for people who look like Nina Simone, and in his worldview things are less limited.

Far, far less limited. (Laughs.) That’s what people mean sometimes when they use the word “privilege.” You have the privilege of not having to look at these ugly things. I get it. You don’t know what you don’t know. To be of the most powerful race and gender in the world, of course that’s going to be your point of view, and it actually gives me a hope that some people can see it that way. But if you’re talking to me, a black woman in America who makes music that’s spiritual and socially conscious and all this stuff that they don’t really want black women in the music industry to do, then I’m gonna have different takes from Judd Apatow. Very different. (Laughs.)

aderpero oduye lisa dees kim wayans pariah screeningWhy are some people taking this portrayal of Nina Simone so seriously? What does she mean to you?

I loved her music and the fact that she was a classically trained pianist and that her voice was so unique, but what made Nina Simone my hero is that I had never seen anyone in the public eye who looked anything like me at all, ever. When you think about the way that we as human beings can inspire each other by being able to be our authentic selves, to deny someone who looks like Nina Simone the opportunity to play her is sad.

It would have been important and impactful had they made a movie about Nina Simone where the actress really looked like her. It would have changed someone’s life, I think. She changed my life just by looking the way she looked.

Like Oprah says, we all want to know, “Do you see me? Do you hear me?” When people don’t look like you in commercials, no one looks like you anywhere, Nina Simone made me feel like I existed. And wouldn’t it be amazing if that happened for someone else?

When you’re a black woman in the entertainment industry, you really feel that black tax. You have to try twice as hard to get half as much, for people to see you or for people to understand your beauty and to photograph your skin the right way, and to think that you’re beautiful enough to want to photograph you the right way. I have had personal conversations with some black women in Hollywood who would be considered some of the most beautiful women in Hollywood, and they struggle with it too: “I lost to this actress because she’s lighter. It’s always me and her, and then she gets it.”

I think that needs to be taken into account any time you talk about Nina Simone. I say this because I look at the world through those same eyes. I came into the music industry and I was really naïve. I know a lot about my history, but I thought, “We live in modern times and I’m gonna have as much of a chance as anybody else.” And I did and I didn’t. I have more access than my mother would have had at my age, but there were other things that were just denied me based on my race and my skin tone and my facial features. 

Lisa SimoneHow does this film portray Nina Simone?

I saw a very early, early version in 2013, so I don’t know what they ended up doing, but it was a lot like the feel that you got from watching the Nina Simone documentary [the recent Oscar-nominated What Happened, Miss Simone?]: She was troubled, she was institutionalized, she had addictions. It doesn’t go into her childhood and things like that. It was just a story about her and the butler, and I guess his perception about what happened when he was with her.

What kind of movie would you like to see about Nina Simone, and who would you want to play her?

The thing for me is that Nina Simone is part of a small sorority of women who came from being considered the least valuable human beings in all of America — a dark-skinned black woman from Jim Crow South, from very oppressed societal situations, like Maya Angelou being abused because you’re just a black girl, Oprah being abused because you’re just a black girl, Nina Simone being abused because you’re just a black girl — and who became self-defined and venerated and successful and influential and made history. I want to see the epic tale of a woman who came from nothing to have everything and who struggled and had a child and mental illness and addictions. I want to see the story of a full person.

If I was going to pick someone I know, I would choose Adepero Oduye [a Sundance breakout for 2011’s Pariah, most recently of The Big Short] because of her acting chops and her facial features. But also, wouldn’t it be cool if somebody just came out of nowhere, like a stage actress or how Lupita Nyong’o just came out of nowhere? Somebody who’s amazing and ethnic and really beautiful and had chops, and then she did this movie and had a chance to elevate her craft the way that Nina Simone did? That to me would capture her essence. To see someone else have that opportunity because she paved that road, that to me would be inspirational.

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here’s why you should never put Q-Tips in your ears

This fan-made movie shows why Darth Maul is the best part of the 'Star Wars' prequels

$
0
0

While many fans despise the "Star Wars" prequels, most can agree that Darth Maul from "The Phantom Menace" is by far the best part of them. A fan-made movie about Darth Maul shows exactly why.

Watch the full movie here and behind-the-scenes here

Story by Ian Phillips and editing by Jeremy Dreyfuss

Follow INSIDER on Facebook
Follow INSIDER on YouTube

Join the conversation about this story »

A 56-year-old man filmed a conversation with his 18-year-old self, and it's going viral

It took over 100 artists to hand paint this movie about Van Gogh


Here’s the untold, dark backstory of ‘Mad Max'

This thrilling new indie sci-fi film speculates about the future of virtual love

$
0
0

Creative ControlThe genius of Futurama was in how its pizza-delivery-guy hero, frozen for 1,000 years, stepped into a new millennium without missing a beat—still poor, still a lovelorn dork, still a delivery guy. People can change, the show allowed, but time and technology won’t do it for them. That can be a difficult lesson, and every new advancement only seems to make it harder.

Creative Control, a droll and deservingly self-satisfied new indie, is effectively a feature-length exploration into the root cause of that phenomenon. Unfolding like a live-action Ghost in the Shell as directed by a young Noah Baumbach, the film is set approximately six minutes from now—far enough into the future that every computer monitor is made out of clear glass, but still near enough to the present that no one can find reliable cellphone reception in New York City.

Poised between the way we live now and the way we hope to live next, the film wends through a queasily familiar Brooklyn where everyone is waiting for tomorrow to make them better than they are today, and struggling to understand that simply showing up isn’t going to do the trick.

Director Benjamin Dickinson (a veteran of the commercial business whose only previous feature was the fascinating but little-seen First Winter) stars as David, a young adman at the kind of overbearingly male Brooklyn agency where everyone thinks they work at Sterling Cooper but looks like they work at Vice. The office culture is summed up by an exchange in which an industry veteran asks a co-worker “Are you a fucking genius?” to which the co-worker replies: “No, I’m just younger than you.”

When our story begins, David has been assigned to the biggest client in his company’s history. The product is a pair of Warby Parker–looking glasses called Augmenta, billed as the first “actually convincing” augmented reality system. The device essentially turns the human brain into an operating system.

When a user puts them on, real life appears magically enhanced: Facial recognition software determines people’s names, algorithms identify the brand of their clothes, and sophisticated graphics imagine what they might look like without them on.

Creative Control

It’s a powerful tool. In fact, the company behind Augmenta doesn’t really know the full extent of what their product can do. In a flourish of foreshadowing, one member of the development team frames the situation thusly: The firm’s competitors are “out there masturbating while we’re in here actually fucking.” Inside or out, everyone is still just thinking about sex.

That’s especially true for David, who’s given a pair of the glasses to test-drive and immediately uses them to create a malleable avatar of Sophie (Alexia Rasmussen), his best friend’s girlfriend. As his relationship with his own girlfriend (Nora Zehetner, the femme fatale from Brick) deteriorates, David finds himself becoming increasingly involved with Sophie, whether in the flesh or just in the world that exists in the glass on his face. A plastic infinity of information is at his fingertips, and all he can think about is how he can use it to engineer more immersive fantasizes about his forbidden crush. The more we augment reality, Dickinson seems to suggest, the more we reveal what’s true about ourselves.

It’s an ethos that’s reflected in the look of the film, as Adam Newport-Berra’s lustrous, anamorphic black-and-white cinematography makes Brooklyn simultaneously appear both more retrograde and more advanced—seen in high contrast from the window of David’s apartment, the marquee of Williamsburg’s Wythe Hotel could have been transplanted from either East Germany or Alphaville.

The aesthetic, complemented by dashes of timeless classical music, effectively creates an alien Williamsburg that often feels more accurate than the one our own eyes allow us to see. That temporal confusion provides the perfect backdrop for the film’s ingeniously lo-fi visual effects, which make Augmenta more convincingly tactile than the technology of Minority Report or its legion of imitators. Even if Creative Control had nothing more to offer it would be valuable evidence that CG, applied with purpose and grace, can be a powerful tool for low-budget filmmakers.

If Ex Machina beating The Force Awakens at the Oscars didn’t already make it clear, the future of FX isn’t in spectacle but in sensation.

Creative Control

And sensation—the difference between seeing and feeling—is what this story is about. For all of the film’s precise and articulate compositions (from its fluid long-take opening to its cruelly succinct last shot), the most resonant image in Creative Controlmight be one of David masturbating alone on his couch as he drools over the mind-blowing illusion in his glasses—it’s futuristic from his perspective, and embarrassingly primitive from ours. Boys and their toys.

Mercifully, Creative Control is neither a screed against the evils of new technology nor a satire of the luddites who retreat from it as a moral imperative. It has disdain for Silicon Valley “disruptors” and for people who can’t wait to tell you they don’t own a TV.

David isn’t an especially likable or interesting guy, and Dickinson overestimates our patience for him during the film’s less focused second half, but this deceptively savage film spares a little empathy for everyone. Every character is as much asshole as victim, and none of them seem to deserve the relationships they’re disrespecting or the opportunities that fall into their laps. But that’s the dirty secret at the crux of new technologies and the advertising engine that makes us lust after them: Our ideals seldom line up with our interests.

Captivatingly confident, unsparingly wry, and agreeably cynical about how the black mirror of technology can reveal our worst qualities by reflecting our best selves, Creative Control is the rare blast of speculative fiction that has the temerity not to limit itself to rhetorical questions. “At any given moment there are a million things vying for our attention,” one character declares. “So where do we let our attention fall?” The answer, Creative Control suggests, is always on ourselves.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A new documentary about senior speed daters proves that in love, age doesn't matter

Watch New York City get consumed by plants in this surreal video

$
0
0

Screen Shot 2016 04 08 at 3.15.20 PM

New York is one of the most architecturally impressive cities in the world.

It looks even more beautiful when taken over by plants.

You'll agree after watching "Wrapped," a short film created by Roman Kälin, Falko Paeper and Florian Wittmann that's won a ton of festival awards and is now viewable online:

 

"The short explores the effects of time and change focusing on the the worlds seemingly never ending cycles,"the creators say.

The film combines time lapse photography with computer graphics to create a surreal 3 minute narrative, like a dystopian Planet Earth documentary. Vines and ferns burst out of bricks and concrete. The Brooklyn Bridge explodes.

Hat tip to 6sqft

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The easiest way to clear out a ton of space on your iPhone superfast

This drone footage of a volcano erupting is insane

$
0
0

The Santiaguito Volcano in Guatemala erupts just about every hour, making it a perfect place to study how volcanoes decide to explode.

It's so reliable that scientists call it a "laboratory volcano."

This incredible footage (which we first saw on reddit) comes from the short film, "Life on the Rim: Working as a Volcanologist" from Zach Voss. In it, he talks to volcanologists about their perilous jobs, and gets some crazy views of the Santiaguito Volcano erupting.

National Geographic's video team selected it for their Short Film Showcase.

Watch the full 4:35-minute video below — it's worth it:

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This active volcano crater contains the world’s largest lava lake

'Avengers' director Joss Whedon says this is the hardest thing about writing movies

$
0
0

joss whedon mark ruffalo

"Avengers" director Joss Whedon is one of the great script doctors of Hollywood. He's helped rework scripts for movies including "Toy Story,""Speed," "Twister," and "X-Men."

During a Tribeca Talks conversation Monday evening, Mark Ruffalo asked Whedon if writing was difficult for him. Whedon noted one thing that is particularly difficult during the writing process for anyone.

"Structure is hard. Structure is always hard, and the most important thing," admitted Whedon. "Structure is work. It's math, it's graphs ..."

"Especially when you're writing for eight superheroes," said Ruffalo, referencing "Avengers: Age of Ultron." The 2015 sequel to Whedon's record-breaking "Avengers" starred a range of heroes, from Thor, Iron Man, and the Hulk, to Vision, the Scarlett Witch, Black Widow, and more. 

avengers age of ultron

During the talk, Whedon explained his mental process for keeping plot points and characters in order while writing. "I will do color charts that look like I'm doing a PowerPoint presentation where just ... 'This is where it's scary. This is where it's funny. This is where we know this ... and everything's got to find it's flow and intersect," he said.

He went on to say that there is nothing that gives him more joy than writing — something that's not difficult to believe since he began writing his own comics after being introduced to them around the age of nine.

"The act of writing, the macro and the micro which is having ideas and then actually writing scenes once you've figured out what they need to be, is perfect bliss," Whedon told the crowd. "It is the greatest thing anybody ever got paid to do. I'll never capture that feeling any other way and I don't need to. What's great is that, as soon as I started writing again, it was there. It was just like, 'Oh my God. It's been so long my old friend.'"

Whedon went on to describe his process of writing particular scenes for "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and how validated it made him feel afterwards. 

 "When I wrote Angel turns evil ... I wrote the scene where he basically pretends that he just doesn't care about her," said Whedon. "He just acts like a d---. And that was an actual — I didn't drop my pen, but I actually looked at it and was like, 'Oh my God. I had no idea I was such a d---!' I accessed this terrible person and I was just so happy that I got this darkness in me that was just appalling."

buffy the vampire slayer sarah michelle gellar

"I'll set out to write a sad scene," he said. "Sometimes I'll write for 90 minutes and then I'll have to stop because I'm all dried out. I just can't cry anymore. So, I'll go do something else and come back to it." 

"I'll laugh, if I think it's funny. I'll get pissed off," Whedon said of writing other scenes. "You know, many people have reported hearing thumps from upstairs while I'm writing stunts and falling down. I'm in it. I'm absolutely in it. I'm playing all the parts [from] every angle. It's the best."

Whedon hinted that he's working on his next project after "Age of Ultron" after a bit of a break, but wouldn't tell fans what he was working on just yet. Though it sounds like it's a movie. 

"The thing that I'm writing now, by which I will not, unfortunately, say a damn thing except that it's super good," he teased. "It's definitely a departure, not from the things I care about, but from the kind of storytelling I've done."

Apparently, it will have an emotional ending so powerful Whedon said it left him crying in public.

"I wrote all the way through the end of the movie and was crying so hard in public that the restaurant closed, the valet guy came to me and then just went away without even talking to me," described Whedon. "I had to take off my shirt and blow my nose into it because they had taken away all the napkins and everything. I couldn't get up. I couldn't stop writing. Then I got in the car, luckily somebody else was driving, and I kept crying for about 20 more minutes."

That was when Whedon realized he wrote the end of the movie. Whatever it is, we can't wait to see his next project if it's like anything else he has done in the past.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The trailer for the first 'Star Wars' spin-off movie 'Rogue One' is here

Viewing all 536 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>